The California cases specifically addressing disability discrimination claims on the basis of weight are few but instructive. Most courts seem to agree that obesity does not constitute a qualifying disability at workplace without proof of physiological cause for that condition. Cassista v. Community Foods, Inc. (1993). That is, simply becoming overweight because of one's self-imposed and voluntary eating habits or lack of exercise is not a qualifying disability, while being overweight due to genetic, hormonal or other disorder may be a protected disability, unless maintaining a certain weight is a required occupational qualification, like it is in the case of paramedics, firefighters, police officers, and flight attendants.
Of course, to be protected under the disability laws, the employer must have actual knowledge that the subject employee's obesity is cause by a particular physiological condition. This means that if an obese employee is seeking an accommodation to his/her condition, it is in that employee's best interest to explain to his management or human resources managers that the reasons for his obesity are outside of his control and are therefore likely to be a medical condition, entitled to legal protection. If the employer is not aware of that, they will have no obligation to comply with disability laws with regard to that overweight employee.
Of course, to be protected under the disability laws, the employer must have actual knowledge that the subject employee's obesity is cause by a particular physiological condition. This means that if an obese employee is seeking an accommodation to his/her condition, it is in that employee's best interest to explain to his management or human resources managers that the reasons for his obesity are outside of his control and are therefore likely to be a medical condition, entitled to legal protection. If the employer is not aware of that, they will have no obligation to comply with disability laws with regard to that overweight employee.
RSS Feed
